As the token cannot be transferred yet, there is no rush in incentivizing users to accumulate.
That proposal makes total sense to me as it’s a good step on the path of decentralized governance.
Although it could lead to a more centralized distribution of the token.
Actual holders would probably keep voting for the strategies they use without having external players buy the token and vote for other strategies.
I guess we’ll see how it goes.
That would be less risky if the token was available for buying. On another hand, we would then need a locking system to avoid governance attacks.
3 Likes