# RFC: MORPHO Grants Framework **URL:** \ **Category:** Governance\ **Created:** [October 17, 2024, 3:07am UTC](https://forum.morpho.org/t/rfc-morpho-grants-framework/901 "2024-10-17T03:07:53Z")\ **Posts on this page:** 1\ **Showing post:** 13
**Author:** ![antonttc](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/flex013/user_avatar/forum.morpho.org/antonttc/32/466_2.png) [@antonttc](https://forum.morpho.org/u/antonttc)\ **Post date:** [October 22, 2024, 6:45am UTC](https://forum.morpho.org/t/rfc-morpho-grants-framework/901/13 "2024-10-22T06:45:38Z")
> [@Hubert](#): > > Perhaps the retroactive grants of Optimism is a good model. The problem with that model is that you give most grants to protocols who don’t need it, so it’s basically lost money. Grants should focus on enabling good things for the ecosystem that wouldn’t be possible without them Second this. We need to make sure the grant program doesn’t turned out to be a “public growth program” where big integrations / established projects get majority of the fund. This will kill the purpose of grant program. Regarding the process and overhead: my 2 cent is that “grant tiers” like [Nouns funding](https://nouns.center/funding/smallgrants) can help somewhere in the process: it gives the council more flexible on when to move quickly with small grants + ensure thoroughness with larger grants. --- _[View the full topic](https://forum.morpho.org/t/rfc-morpho-grants-framework/901)._