Gm!
I think the extra information you provided IS some of the more key relevant information that makes the proposal more advantageous. Two of the largest value propositions being multichain indexing and BD.
The only discrepancies I see for the type of funding you’ve requested vs. the expected impact is that the compensation is structured almost entirely as a “payment for work” rather than ongoing service for results.
This proposal does not provide data or validation of Oku’s previous success, but, from a BD perspective I can see how GFX could be a great partner as you are well connected and respected around the industry. I have always enjoyed your pragmatism as well.
Would Oku and GFX stand to generate more revenue in the future from onboarding Morpho users? In which case the below suggestion I make creates more incentive alignment.
In short, the only major adjustment i’d like to see in the proposal is one where the compensation is primarily structured on achieving goals (TVL?), beyond the $100k/$100mil bonus structure.
If it was more results orientated I would vote yes.